corbden: (Default)
Our brains evolved to comprehend stories. Stories are the natural result of linear time, i.e. this causes that which causes that and so on. A species which evolves to understand this fundamental nature of time will have an extreme advantage over competitors. It gives us the ability to learn from past mistakes and predict future outcomes. Our advanced ability to consciously understand and communicate narrative is ultimately what sets us apart from other animals.

Our ability to understand and create story is so important that our biology forces each of us to practice every single night... when we dream.

Symbols are a basic aspect to stories and the words we tell them with. The word is not the thing. A word is merely a symbol we use to refer to the thing. But words are not the only symbols, and our subconscious thrives on pre-verbal symbolic thinking (though it can understand words, too). And an assembly of these symbols in some kind of cause/effect sequence is what we call a "narrative." Narratives are often told with words, but can take visual and other forms as well. For instance, a game is a narrative. Who will win? How will they win?

As a writer, I study how narratives work. Every movie and TV show I watch, every book I read, a part of my brain is studying the author's narrative style, character development, metaphor and symbolism, theme, foreshadowing, plot and pacing, and all the other tools of the trade.

One "no-no" in the writing world is the dream sequence. Or at least, dream sequences need to be handled with care. A reader/viewer doesn't want to feel they've wasted their time. We don't like our football yanked away. A depiction of something shocking and consequential (like the death of a character), and then ending with, "It was all a dream!" feels cheap and disappointing. It undermines trust in the rest of the narrative. It damages the suspension of disbelief. A writer needs to handle a dream sequence very carefully to avoid a disappointed audience.

But a dream sequence can be beneficial if it conveys new information or has a material effect on the rest of the story. This can either be the character learning something about their waking world because of the dream, or it inspires action, or the dream conveys symbolic information to the viewer that helps us understand the character or story theme.

Bad dream: The protagonist is riding her bike and gets hit by a bus oh no! wait, she wakes up and "it was all a dream."

Good dream: The protagonist is riding her bike and notices a sign she passes every day. But now the sign has a picture of her best friend. A bus crashes through the sign and she awakens with the sense that her friend is in trouble. She calls her friend.

Good dream: The protagonist is riding her bike and a bus nearly hits her. She notices the face of the driver is her co-worker holding a knife. Later in the story's real-world, her co-worker is revealed to be the antagonist who is secretly trying to "kill her ambitions" and "cut off her avenues" to success.

Good Dream: The protagonist is riding her bicycle and is hit by a bus. As she is dying, she sees that the driver is herself. Upon waking, she doesn't understand the dream, but the viewer, putting together other parts of the story, realizes that the character is unknowingly undermining herself.

Stories are like dreams in that they convey information to us about our waking world. The symbols of our collective dreams mirror the symbols of our collective stories. Likewise as a writer, my individual symbols mirror the symbols that appear in my stories. By learning about narrative symbology, we can learn about our own collective and individual subconscious language. This helps us get more in touch with our inner lives and the inner life of our larger culture. Stories and dreams intertwine to give us a richer, more connected, more pro-social and psychologically healthy world. When we can understand symbols and how they reinforce theme in a story, we can better come to appreciate what an author does when they weave a compelling narrative. I have a lot of "I see what you did there" moments now while consuming narratives created by others.

For more information on understanding the symbols in your own dreams, I recommend the book "Radical Dreaming" by John Goldhammer.

For understanding use of theme in narrative, in a how-to sense, I recommend "Story" by Robert McKee.

For understanding myth in narrative, there are the old standbys by Joseph Campbell, especially "The Hero with a Thousand Faces," or just watch his interviews with Bill Moyer, "The Power of Myth": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE8ciMkayVM

Campbell's work was inspired by Carl Jung, and his book "Man and His Symbols" is an excellent primer on the topic.
corbden: (Default)
My dad and I got into a fight about Elon Musk and Twitter last night. My dad has this thing where he thinks he knows more than I do on topics he as zero experience with, and it's incredibly invalidating, so things got really heated. Because he spent about a week on Twitter maybe back in 2010 and I've spent nearly every day on there since 2007. And he was defending Musk using conspiracy theories that didn't pass my smell test. Like, at all. But he defended them passionately, even though he didn't have nearly the stake in the question as I do, and had a fraction of the knowledge I have. He also said he KNEW his beliefs were correct, whereas I was merely pushing what I thought were high probabilities.

So afterward, I began ruminating, as I do (it's terribly unhealthy), and tried to get at what underlying belief my dad was *really* defending. Capitalism is good? Billionaires are perfect? Fox News is right?

No, it's deeper and far less conscious than this. I know what belief he's defending because I once had it: The Chosen Messiah Will Always Save the Day

It's not surprising I had this belief, or that a lot of Americans have it, especially if we've got a Christian background, but it permeates our secular media, too. Luke Skywalker can take down the Death Star by himself. Neo will destroy the Matrix with his sheer talent. Harry Potter will take out Voldemort with his superior wits and power. Sure, their friends helped, but only because they had a single leader strong enough to overcome the overpowering darkness.

I was challenging his unexamined belief in the Savior Myth. Which might cause him to question his literal Savior. All very incredibly subconscious cognitive dissonance resolution ala Leon Festinger stuff. (This is all very much along the lines that I write about when I explore mind control and why people believe things. I know I'm wildly speculating here, but remember, this topic is my wheelhouse.)

So first my dad has to invent overpowering darkness that Elon was rescuing Twitter from, like every Savior narrative needs. But none of that story added up to me. (Apparently the 3700 laid off employees deserved it because a handful of them were selling verifications for $15k on the side? It wasn't making sense and he didn't have a lot of details for his story which was one reason it didn't pass the sniff test. I need details!!) Any of my challenges to Elon's character seemed to raise his ire. Every single bad decision I listed off, my dad defended. Even while I had to explain basic, rudimentary ways that Twitter (and the rest of the internet) function. He was completely unwilling to question a single cog in his cognitive structure.

When we look at these surface-beliefs that we think a group of people have, that's usually not the real belief. They don't know it themselves. And I know this primarily from examining my own beliefs, and uncovering the underlying value set that I'm extending like a ladder to get the resulting belief. What support stone am I pulling out when I go up against someone in disagreement? That's the real reason people get emotional. I was emotional because Twitter has been my online homebase for 15 years. I expressed that. But my dad didn't know why he was emotional. Maybe I don't either, but I'm guessing it's this. If Elon isn't the Savior dad thinks he is, then maybe there are a lot of other Saviors he's got to question as well.

Edit to add: I've examined my internalized Savior myth. That was one of the biggest shifts in my politics, because it's that kind of underlying belief about how the world functions that results in grand conclusions. I learned through experience and seeing evidence that nearly every great accomplishment was done with a team or large collective. The biggest things ever accomplished (especially in free societies) were done by huge teams of people all doing their part. Saving Twitter (if it needed "saving"?) needed to be a team effort of thousands of Twitter employees and millions of Twitter users. It seems ridiculous to me now that one single person, even as a leader of people, could fix the kinds of complex issues Twitter had.

Profile

corbden: (Default)
Luna Corbden

November 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
67891011 12
1314 15 16 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 09:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios